måndag 14 oktober 2013

Sweden Rejects Child Prostitution Damages Claim


Sweden has said it will not award damages to two women claiming to have been exploited in a major prostitution scandal in the 1970s.

Chancellor of Justice Göran Lambertz, Sweden’s most senior legal official, said he had no reason to doubt that the women had been exposed to “a large number of sex offences”. But Lambertz also referred in his judgment to the statute of limitations, which imposes a ten year cut-off point for damages claims of this kind.
The women were just 14 years old when the scandal broke in 1976.
The Chancellor of Justice agreed with the women that a more thorough investigation ought to have been carried out at the time. But the failure of the investigation to lead to a prosecution did not constitute “an error on which to base a compensation claim”.

Lambertz also concurred with the women that prosecutors should have pushed harder to have those involved in the scandal convicted for purchasing sexual services from children. But this did not mean the women had a legitimate claim to damages, according to Lambertz.


Prosecutors at the time did not think they would be able to successfully pursue charges against the suspects “and for this reason it was not a serious mistake on the state’s behalf,” wrote Lambertz in his judgment.
Eva Bengtsson, one of the women claiming compensation from the state, said she was not surprised by the decision.

“It was expected, but I plan to keep going with this. I think these men should step forward,” she told news agency TT.

Bengtsson added that the verdict had left her with a sense of disappointment in the justice system.
“There shouldn’t be a statute of limitations for something like this. These men are pedophiles. We were 13 and 14 years old when this happened. It wouldn’t be accepted today,” she said, adding that she would reach a decision on how to press forward with the case after consultation with her lawyer.
The scandal began with a raid on a Stockholm brothel in 1976. In May of that year, the brothel madam, Doris Hopp, was arrested on pimping charges. A police investigation soon revealed that many of Hopp’s customers were well-known politicians.

Lennart Geijer
November 1977 newspaper Dagens Nyheter rocked the foundations of Sweden’s political establishment by publishing allegations citing Justice Minister Lennart Geijer as one of the customers.

The newspaper claimed as its source a report in which chief of police Carl Persson informed Prime Minister Olof Palme of the involvement of politicians in the prostitution scandal.
But Palme vehemently denied the allegations, accusing Dagens Nyheter of aggravated libel. The newspaper was forced into a retreat and two days after the publication Lennart Geijer received an official apology.

It later emerged however that, a few minor details aside, the newspaper’s assertions had in fact been largely correct. Over the years, there has been much speculation regarding the identities of those who made use of the brothel’s services.
At the time of the scandal broke, it was not illegal to pay for sexual services. But the fact that politicians socialized with prostitutes was viewed as a security risk since staff from foreign embassies were also reported to frequent the brothel.

Olof Johansson (in 1991) & Thorbjörn Fälldin
Former Prime Minister Thorbjörn Fälldin and former Centre Party leader Olof Johansson have both previously denied frequenting Doris Hopp’s brothel.
Article from: http://www.thelocal.se/10108/20080226/
Olof Palme Suspected Of Paedophilia
By Jonathan Newton | newtonline.wordpress.com


Olof Palme
…the most hushed-down scandal in Swedish history resurfaced again, and it fills me with such grief. It is a story that is on par with the infamous Belgian paedophile scandal, with the only difference that the cover-up has succeeded in this case.
The scandal in essence is that there is reason to believe that two Swedish Prime ministers during the 1970s, the internationally known Olof Palme, and Thorbjörn Fälldin, were customers at a network of prostitutes which involved underage girls. In other words, should the allegations be true, these men were paedophiles.
And not only them. The investigation – hushed down as it is – involves a long list of top politicians and celebrities of the time. Some 70 names have been mentioned.
The girls, around 14 at the time, have now grown up, and yesterday, they held a press conference where two of them are demanding compensation fron the Swedish state.

But it doesn’t end there. As I have mentioned, there has never been a proper investigation of these matters. Olof Palme lied to the entire Swedish people when he denied that the then head of the Swedish police, Carl Persson, had written to him to inform him that his Minister of Justice, Lennart Geijer, was frequenting prostitutes and could therefore be subject to blackmail – especially since some of the prostitutes were from the Communist bloc. Mr Persson’s note was disclosed in the daily Dagens Nyheter in 1977, but Olof Palme could see from the way the article was written that the paper did not have access to the note itself. Olof Palme very aggressively denied that the note had ever existed and called the whole thing rumours and worse, but in 1991, the note was declassified and confirmed that Mr Geijer was in fact buying sex.
Why Olof Palme put his entire career at stake to lie so blatantly – about something he likely knew was true – remains an enigma; he was murdered in 1986 and took his secrets to his grave. But the fact is that the former prostitutes yesterday repeated that he would hve beneone of their customers. Did he lie in order to protect himself?

Worse still, his Minister of Justice – Mr Geijer – was trying at the time to decriminalise paedophilia (yes, it’s true). Thank God he was stopped, but that further adds to the sleaziness of it all.
Meanwhile, the girls – several of whom have identified top politicians as customers, independently of one another – descended into personal problems and drug abuse, frustrated about the massive cover-up form the establishment. They have never budged one inch from their story; they insist to this day that what they allege is true.

The whole thing has resurfaced from time to time in Sweden, but has just as regularly vanished from the headlines again and led to no repercusisons at all. Only one person has ever been tried and found guilty, Sigvard Hammar, a marginal figure who was a TV journalist as well as a paraplegic and thus less into the circles of power, who also openly admitted abusing underage girls. But he was sentenced for procuring, not for abusing minors.

There is much more to say about this disgusting, nauseating, stomach-turning, sinister, evil, deprave, vicious mess. How Dagens Nyheter’s source, criminologist Leif G W Persson who worked for Carl Persson at the time, found not only his desk but his entire room emptied the day after Dagens Nyheter broke the story. How the cover-up in 1977 was orchestrated by people involving the then Chief Constable of Stockholm, Hans Holmér, the same police officer who later made a complete mess of the murder investigation ofOlof Palme - for whatever reason. How Thorbjörn Fälldin before the Swedish Parliament in 1977 stated that the entire list of suspects must have been false simply because his own name was on it – and how the Swedish nation chose to believe him.
And how an unknown number of young girls had their lives ruined by the men in power that were supposed to provide their ultimate security.
So, will there be a proper investigation this time? At present, it doesn’t seem likely. The story has already been moved to the back pages, and it seems that the whole thing will once again be ground down into the bureaucratic machinery.

Article from: http://newtonline.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/
olof-palme-suspected-of-paedophilia/


Sweden Arming The World: The Neutrality that Never Was

By Henrik Palmgren and Elizabeth Leafloor | RedIceCreations.com


Stockholm is bristling with weaponry today. Fighter jets can be seen and heard racing through the skies over a wondering populace. Is Sweden at war?
Not officially, but since WWII and despite a political position of neutrality, Sweden has been playing an increased role in international warfare. This can be clearly seen today, because this week FDS Nordic is taking place in Stockholm.
The Future Defence & Security Exhibition is “the most important trade fair in the Nordic and Baltic countries covering the topics of defense and security. Among the professional visitors are decision-makers from governments and the military, as well as representatives from emergency services.”


At these arms fairs, which drum up sales in the undeniably lucrative weapons and defense industry, many areas are promoted: ammunition, command systems, control systems, electronic warfare systems, telecommunications, surveillance, and tactical equipment – the list is lengthy.
The FDS site suggests the weapons (or “products”), “meet the requirements from the government and military units, produced for the homeland defence and peacekeeping around the world.”
But like many countries that emphasize their roles in simple and noble ‘peacekeeping’, there’s usually more going on than meets the eye. Corruption in the arms trade is ubiquitous, and Sweden is no exception.
Speaking of eyes, once again a symbol is used by the powerful and influential denoting what looks like the omnipresent All-Seeing-Eye. The logo of FDS Nordic, naturally:
“Point, Click, Kill: The Warfare of Tomorrow”
The topics discussed by guest speakers are what you might expect from such an event: “Nano-ID Security Systems”, “Tactical Training”, and “Legal aspects of doing business in Sweden”.
However, to the average person, the workshops might seem somewhat unnerving. The “Point, Click, Kill” seminar is a talk about cyber espionage and cyber economic warfare, but it also communicates the modern ease with which war and extrajudicial killings are carried out – from a distance and impersonally with remote drone technology. Click, kill, done.
Drones, with their remote surveillance and attack capabilities, are also a big player in ‘neutral’ Sweden.
How does one maintain ‘noninterference’ while still engaging in warfare?
“War, Soldiers and Swedish Confusion”
“Krig, soldater och svensk förvirring” is an appropriately named seminar during FDS Nordic. It translates to English: “War, Soldiers, and Swedish Confusion”.
The seminar is given by Johanne Hildebrandt, “a former journalist, but also a writer and columnist. She is known for her journalistic work about the war and conflict in which she, among other things, has worked as an “embedded” reporter with U.S. soldiers in Iraq and Swedish soldiers in Afghanistan” (Source)
In fact, one of her books was so well received by the establishment, that she was elected into the Royal Swedish Academy of War Sciences in 2012.
Swedes are right to be ‘confused’ about their involvement in international warfare. The rest of the world, also, remains largely ignorant about the reality of Sweden’s legendary political policy of ‘neutrality’. It’s an idea that is repeated, but not supportable.
Wikipedia tells the public that “Swedish neutrality – national policy since the end of the Napoleonic Wars – was maintained during World War II.” That’s true, if you consider arming both sides of a conflict to be ‘neutral’.
Swedish Prime Minister Per Albin Hansson declared Sweden neutral on 1 September 1939, but the idealized intent on paper was not necessarily what resulted on the ground. While it’s very true that Sweden suffered hardships for their proclaimed uninvolvement, (such as trade blockades, food shortages, supply rationing, and a dangerous political dance), Sweden also supplied Europe willingly, and in doing so, supported and lengthened the bloody war.
Perhaps the most important aspect of Sweden’s concessions to Germany during the Second World War was the extensive export of iron ore for use in the German weapons industry, reaching ten million tons per year. 
[...]
Sir Ralph Glyn, a British Member of Parliament, claimed that a cessation of Swedish iron ore exports would bring the war to an end within six months.
These shipments were attacked by British aircraft and submarines in the Atlantic and North Sea and by Soviet submarines in the Baltic. About 70 vessels were sunk and 200 sailors lost their lives
Source
As for the Allies:
US planes were allowed to use Swedish military bases during the liberation of Norway, from spring 1944 to 1945, and the Allies were also collaborating with the Swedish Military Intelligence and Security Service. Sweden allowed Allied spies to listen to German radio signals from a station on Öland. A location was also established in Malmö for the British military to lead bombing actions in Germany.
[...]
The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom during World War II, Winston Churchill, accused Sweden of ignoring the greater moral issues and playing both sides for profit during the conflict.
Source
This accusation rings true in modern times, even while Sweden still seemingly sports the guise of neutrality. The argument that Sweden is NOT neutral as long as it arms foreign lands has sustained since 1939.
Stephen Prokesch wrote for the NYTimes in 1989;
Sweden has long had mixed feelings about its position as a major exporter of weapons.
On one hand, it has believed that it needed a large weapons industry to maintain its neutrality and that was impossible without exports. On the other hand, Sweden has also taken the position that it should not ship weapons to regions where there are conflicts, tensions or human rights violations.
Now a series of scandals and Sweden’s economic struggles to maintain its weapons-manufacturing base are forcing the country face these conflicting aims head on.
Government-appointed commissions have been re-examining Sweden’s rules and policies on arms exports. Export controls were tightened last year in an effort to make sure that weapons were really going to the authorized foreign customer. Government and industry officials predict Sweden will soon adopt policies that could lead to tougher restrictions on exports to third world nations.
[...]
In addition, the Government is preparing legislation for new restrictions on exports of technology that could have peaceful uses but could also be used for mass destruction. These include chemicals, technology that could be used in ballistic missiles and equipment that could be used to make biological warfare weapons.

Unfortunately, even to this day Sweden deals in arms while hiding behind a perceived impartiality, much in the way NATO bombs foreign countries under the guise of a ‘right to protect’ the civilians of the land.
As recently as 2010, the headlines revealed that “USA’s Sweden ambassador has reported that Sweden is a “strong and pragmatic partner”, whose official non-alignment does not reflect reality, according to US diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks”. Source
There’s probably a lesson to be learned in this strange state of things. “1984” author George Orwell famously wrote ““War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.” Those timeless oxymorons stand for how ideas can be contorted and words are meaningless – they can be twisted to mean whatever you wish them to, no matter how ironic, sad, or contradictory. The powerful, then, can use to our perceptions to control us.
Tragically, we’re experiencing an era when men and nations are awarded Peace prizes while they create and prolong wars, support dictatorships, destabilize countries, and beget suffering, murder, poverty, and genocide.
Does today’s Sweden really believe that,
Involvement is Neutrality,
Weaponizing is Peacekeeping,
Peril is Security?


By Henrik Palmgren and Elizabeth Leafloor , RedIceCreations.com
Sweden slammed for jets over Libya as ’neutral’ becomes ’NATO’
Sweden Ranks Second in the World in Per Capita Weapons Exports (2008)

Swedish Zionist Ewa Björling Attends the Bilderberg Meeting in 2011

Zionist Federation of Sweden Presents the Jerusalem Prize

September 19, 2006
Israel’s Ambassador to Sweden, Eviatar Manor, presented the Jerusalem prize to parliamentarian Ewa Bjoerling.


The chairman of the Zionist Federation of Sweden, Mr. Bo Sallmander, introduced the prize winner and her courageous stand in defense of Israel and democracy against the ambiguous policies of the former Swedish government. Ms. Bjoerling is also a professor in microbiology at Karolinska Institute, specializing in the fight against HIV and AIDS.


The Great synagogue was filled, for the manifestation in support of Israel organized by the Jewish Community and the Swedish Israel-Information Committee (SII). After the speech by Mr. Sallmander and the handing over of the prize, speeches were given by the Chairperson of the Community Lena Posner Körösi, writer Per Ahlmark, Ambassador Eviatar Manor and Chairman of the Liberal Youth party Fredrik Malm, and Ms. Lisa Abramowicz of SII.

In 2006 Björling was awarded with the “Jerusalem Prize” from the Zionist Federation in Sweden. The award is given to persons who has shown “extraordinary support for Israel, Jerusalem and Zionism”.