onsdag 15 maj 2013

Arrest the Swedish criminal Stefan Lindskog and his criminal boss Marianne Lundius


Swedish supreme court judge's lecture is criticized

A judge of the Supreme Court (HD) in Sweden held a lecture on the case Julian Assange of Australia. That a justiteråd ruling on a case that could end up in supreme court has faced criticism from Wikileaks in Australia and from Assange. The judge's actions can affect the public's view of the Swedish legal system, according to supreme court's chairman.


Since autumn 2010, is an ongoing investigation in Sweden, which is investigating whether Wikileaksgrundaren Julian Assange committed sexual offenses. Julian Assange, who avoids sent from Britain to Sweden by staying inside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, says that the reason he did not want to go to Sweden is that he is afraid to Sweden to extradite him to the United States.

During a holiday in Julian Assange's native Australia has Counsellor Stefan Lindskog, held a lecture on the legal aspects surrounding the investigation of sex crimes and the legal aspects that would record whether the United States would seek Assange's extradition from Sweden.

 An excerpt from the preferred, held at the University of Adelaide, has also been published in the Australian Financial Review newspaper. Stefan Lindskog writing including "It's funny how the Assange case shows potential for sharp turns when it comes to the topics discussed. From one hand, the lies about condoms can be a sex crime to, on the other hand, the question about telling the truth by publishing classified information may constitute a breach allowing extradition to the state that considers itself injured. "

 
Judicial Council's actions have received Counsel Greg Barns, who is the spokesperson for the organization Australian Lawyers Association and who runs the campaign for Julian Assange elected to the Australian Senate, to react.

- That a Swedish justices believe that it is acceptable tends to confirm concerns people feel about fairness and stability in the Swedish legal system. It provides great wrong to think that Assange's case has become highly politicized in Sweden, he tells the Sydney Morning Herald.

Greg Barns also calls Australia's chief prosecutor to review the case with the Swedish Chief Prosecutor.

Also Julian Assange is critical to Stefan Lindskog's actions.


 - The development is part of a pattern in which high-ranking Swedes, including the Swedish Foreign Minister, Prime Minister and Minister of Justice, all have attacked me or Wikileaks publicly says Wikileaksgrundaren according to the Sydney Morning Herald at Fairfax Media.

In an email to the Svenska Dagbladet writes Stefan Lindskog that there is no impediment to supreme court judge at the level of principle discusses legal issues "that are or may be sub judice."

Stefan Lindskog also points out that he, if he would be well favored in a case involving Assange, has the opportunity to resign if he thinks something makes him unfit to hear the case.


 Neither the Supreme Court president Marianne Lundius sees Stefan Lindskog's lecture and article as something that can affect any court cases relating to Assange ever get there. However, she believes that the Justice Council involvement can affect the image of the Swedish legal system.

 
- In this case, it may be perceived as more sensitive because it is tied to Assange, and that there is still an arrest warrant against him. It is very important that there is confidence in the Court, said Marianne Lundius.

Assange is not charged with any crime in Sweden. For the case to be disposed of in supreme court prosecution must first prosecute, then the case must go through both the District Court and the Court of Appeal before either party has the opportunity to appeal in HD. In that case, it is primarily a matter of the case at all to be addressed in supreme court, because the court only takes up the cases sentenced a precedent.


All extradition cases to the Supreme Court, if the person whose extradition is requested objects. But the U.S. has not prosecuted Assange with any crime, nor tried to get him extradited.

After a lengthy process decided the highest court in the UK in late May last year that Assange be handed over to Sweden for the inquiry to continue. However, he has not been brought to Sweden because he was then in June is in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. Assange has been granted political asylum in Ecuador.





Inga kommentarer:

Skicka en kommentar